Financial Advisor Sean Righter has been the Subject of Five Customer Disputes

• September 4, 2025
• Morgan Stanley

Sean P. Righter (CRD#: 5419832) is a registered investment advisor with One Capital Management, LLC in Newport Beach, CA.

Broker’s History

He entered the securities industry in 2007 and previously worked with Citigroup Global Markers Inc., and Morgan Stanley.

Current and Past Allegations of Conduct Leading to Investment Loss

According to publicly available records released by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), in March 2025, Sean Righter became the subject of a customer dispute where Claimant alleged, inter alia,  “that the investments strategy executed in the client’s account was unsuitable – Jan 2021 to Jan 2025.” The damage amount requested is $1,300,000.00 and the customer dispute is still pending.

In addition, Sean Righter has been the subject of four other customer disputes:

• February 2025—“ Claimants allege, inter alia, unsuitability with respect to investments in managed accounts – November 2020 to January 2025. The customer dispute is still pending.
• July 2024—“Claimant alleges that the investments strategy executed in the client’s accounts was unsuitable, and that the FA failed to properly ascertain the client’s investor profile.” The customer dispute settled for $20,000.00
• August 2023—“ Claimant alleges, inter alia, that the investments strategy executed in the clients’ account were unsuitable – 2020-2023.” The customer dispute settled for $315,000.00.
• March 2023—“ Claimants allege, inter alia, unsuitability with respect to investments in accounts – 2020 – 2023.” The customer dispute settled for $1,200,000.00.

For a copy of Sean Righer’s SEC AdvisorInfo, click here.

We Help Investors Recover Investment Losses

Financial advisors have a legal and regulatory obligation to recommend only suitable investments that are appropriate for their clients’ needs and objectives. Their employing brokerage firm has a legal and regulatory obligation to supervise the Financial Advisors’ sales practices and dealings with clients. To the extent any of these duties are breached, the customer may be entitled to a recovery of his or her investment losses.

Reasonable basis suitability requires that a recommended investment or investment strategy be suitable or appropriate for at least some investors. Reasonable basis suitability requires an advisor to conduct adequate due diligence so that he or she can determine the risks and rewards of the investment or investment strategy.

Customer-specific suitability requires that a member or associated person have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation is suitable for a particular customer based on that customer’s investment profile. Among the criteria that a financial advisor must evaluate to satisfy his or her customer-specific suitability obligations include the investor’s age, tax status, time horizon, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance; a client’s other investments, financial situation and needs, investment objectives, and any other information disclosed by the customer should also be considered.

Excessive trading often occurs when a Financial Advisor puts his or her interests ahead of the clients and makes transactions solely for the purpose of generating commissions. Financial Advisors have a regulatory duty to recommend suitable investment strategies. One of the components of the suitability analysis is quantitative suitability.

Quantitative suitability requires a brokerage firm or financial advisor with actual or de facto control over a customer’s account to have a reasonable basis for believing that a series of recommended transactions – even if suitable when viewed in isolation – is not excessive and unsuitable for the customer when taken together in light of the customer’s investment profile. No single test defines excessive activity, but factors such as the turnover rate, the cost-equity ratio, and the use of in-and-out trading in a customer’s account may provide a basis for a finding that a member or associated person has violated the quantitative suitability obligation. Financial advisors have a legal and regulatory obligation to recommend only suitable investments that are appropriate for their clients’ needs and objectives. Their employing brokerage firm has a legal and regulatory obligation to supervise the Financial Advisors’ sales practices and dealings with clients. To the extent any of these duties are breached, the customer may be entitled to a recovery of his or her investment losses.

The Wolper Law Firm represents investors nationwide in securities litigation and arbitration on a contingency fee basis. Matt Wolper, the Managing Principal of the Wolper Law Firm, is a trial lawyer who has handled hundreds of securities cases during his career involving a wide range of products, strategies and securities. Prior to representing investors, he was a partner with a national law firm, where he represented some of the largest banks and brokerage firms in the world in securities matters. We can be reached at (800) 931-8452 or by email at mwolper@wolperlawfirm.com